HARRY POTTER AND THE GOBLET OF FIRE [2005]
 |
"10 Things I Hate About Hardly Waiting And The Goblet of Teen Angst"
BY: JASON
VERNON |
OVERALL
RATING |
ENDING
RATING |
 |
 |
|
Harry's fourth summer and the
following year at Hogwarts are marked by the Quidditch World Cup and the
Triwizard Tournament, in which student representatives from three different
wizarding schools compete in a series of increasingly challenging contests.
However, Voldemort's Death Eaters are gaining strength and even creating the
Dark Mark giving evidence that the Dark Lord is ready to rise again. In the
unsuspecting lives of the young wizard and witches at Hogwarts the
competitors are selected by the goblet of fire, which this year makes a very
surprising announcement: Hogwarts will have two representatives in the
tournament, including Harry Potter! Will Harry be able to rise to the
challenge for the Tri Wizard Tournament while keeping up with school or will
the challenges along with Voldemort's rebirth be too much for the young
hero? Probably. |
|
I’m not a fan of the Harry Potter books. There. I said it. I also haven’t
read any of them thus making it more difficult for me to be a fan. I am
however a firm believer that if you’re going to make a movie out of a book,
the movie damn well better stand on its own. Go watch Fight Club for an
example of what I’m talking about. I say that to deflect any “Oh but the
book is much better” argument here. I don’t care.
I did enjoy the first and third
Harry Potter movies (somehow I skipped the second one in its entirety but
I’ve seen bits), the first one especially. After all that it probably seems
pretty clear that I’m going to pan the fourth installment. The movie was
entertaining, and for the 157 minute run time it didn’t drag. That’s all
the nice things I’m going to say.
How can you have four
people very nervous about fighting dragons, talk about them being nervous,
show the dragons, fire the big cannon leading into the dragon fights, and
then skip the dragon fights. To be fair there was a dragon chase, but
that’s hardly a dragon fight. I’d much rather have watched dragon fights
than a high school dance. I’d also very much like to have a miniature
pocket dragon.
The movie falls into this
trap a lot, the trap of enticing me with promises of something interesting
and then showing me something devastatingly uninteresting. I don’t
know about you, but I go see Harry Potter movies because I’m a dork and I
like magic and wizards and those sorts of things. If there’s a
tri-wizard tournament that will make its winner a legend for the ages, and
the participants are chosen by a goblet of fucking fire that’s what I want
the movie to be about, not about pubescent wizards dealing with harsh
realities of being a teenager. During the movie I was on high alert to
avert my gaze during the scene where Harry “magically” sprouts his first
pubes. If I were
attending “magic high school” and instead of the dance involving, I dunno, maybe
FUCKING MAGIC, there is some weird goth band singing DragonForce lyrics over
pop-rock music I’d pack my bags.
I know Harry and his friends
are kids and thus subjected to the same real world problems as you and I,
but it’s also a movie and about MAGIC. The other movies had no problem
circumventing all that other horse shit. When everyone gets together to play some
weird version of flying soccer, that’s what you see. Not everything leading
up to said game and then cut to a gay little singing and dancing party full
of awkward teens.
It’s sad that the story of
Harry Potter is so compelling. Sad in that I have to imagine what it would
be like it decent actors were to be telling that story. I understand that
it would be hard (and probably would incite riots) if the actors were
changed mid-stream, but I don’t think acting lessons should be out of the
question. Some moments are so rigid and fake that I think blame falls more
closely on the shoulders of the director than on the actors. Newell has
directing some decent movies in the past, but I think Columbus and Cuaron
did a much better job with the series.
|
| ADDED ON 11/24/05 |
|
HOWL'S MOVING CASTLE [2005]
 |
"Film
Dripping with Nuclear Fallout"
BY: JASON
VERNON |
OVERALL
RATING |
ENDING
RATING |
 |
 |
|
Academy
Award®-winning director Hayao Miyazaki ("Spirited Away")
takes moviegoers on an amazing new animated adventure that celebrates
the power of love to transform and the resiliency of the human spirit
in the face of adversity. Brimming with a blend of imagination, humor,
action, and romance, "Howl's Moving Castle" recently played
to great acclaim at the 2004 Venice Film Festival, and has become one
of the biggest blockbusters of all time in Japan – earning more
than $193 million at the box office and still counting.
A distinguished cast of actors, under the direction of Pixar's Pete Docter
("Monsters, Inc."), lend their vocal talents to this English-language
version of the film. Sophie (voiced by Emily Mortimer), an average teenage
girl working in a hat shop, finds her life thrown into turmoil when she
is literally swept off her feet by a handsome-but-mysterious wizard named
Howl (voiced by Christian Bale), and is subsequently turned into a 90-year
old woman (voiced by screen legend and two-time Oscar® nominee Jean
Simmons) by the vain and conniving Wicked Witch of the Waste (voiced by
screen legend and Oscar® nominee Lauren Bacall). Embarking on an incredible
odyssey to lift the curse, she finds refuge in Howl's magical moving castle
where she becomes acquainted with Markl, Howl's apprentice, and a hot-headed
fire demon named Calcifer (voiced by Billy Crystal). Sophie's love and
support comes to have a major impact on Howl, who flies in the face of
orders from the palace to become a pawn of war and instead risks his life
to help bring peace to the kingdom. Extraordinary characters, inventive
imagery, and stunning artistry make this latest masterpiece from the visionary
Miyazaki an unforgettable filmgoing experience. |
| Let’s
preface this by saying I’m a big fan of cartoons, especially the
Japanese import kind. Not quite to the level of “fan boy”
but certainly more than a casual viewer. With that in mind I thoroughly
enjoyed this movie. Miyazaki’s work does begin to run together a
little with this latest piece, but when excellence starts to imitate itself
it’s hard to wag a finger and say “Bad director. No,”
and rub his nose in it. Much of the symbolism and stylization of figures
will seem very familiar to fans of Spirited Away. I don’t feel that
picking into specifics of this movie alone will do you, the reader, or
myself much good. I suggest you watch this movie. That’s about the
most I feel I can say about it in and of itself. So let’s back away
a little and see how dropping a nuclear bomb on a country can rather fuck
up that country’s self-identity - in a surprisingly good way of
course.
I’m speaking mostly out of personal analysis of the genre with little
research beyond the movies themselves, so if you tend to disagree I can’t
really blame you. But you can’t disagree with what you haven’t
read and what I haven’t yet written… You don’t have
to read very deeply into most Anime to see a culture whose every pore
is drenched with nuclear fallout. Princess Mononoke where the sinews of
war transform creatures into hideous mutations which spread poison everywhere
they go. A similar theme in Spirited Away. Grave of the Fire Flies is
quite on the point of the nuclear bomb. Akira and its ultra sleek future
filled with genetic freaks, the result of scientific tampering. Big O
(an anime series) involves an entire city devoid of its memories, somehow
destroyed all at once. The list goes on and on. With an event as horrific
and all encompassing as the atomic bomb(s) it’s a bit redundant to say
that it heavily influenced their culture. I simply find that if you look at
an anime film, series, graphic novel or comic in that particular light it
could perhaps help you to understand more of the motivations behind the
themes of the medium.
To boil it down further, this whole argument formed in my mind because
I became tired of watching these beautiful films and constantly saying
to myself “What the fuck is going on?” In our culture whenever
you hear a music cue “Ba dum. Ba dum ba dum ba dum” you immediately
remember Jaws and a million references and feelings go through your mind
helping you to better understand a scene simply by the cultural reference.
I am constantly getting the feeling that I’m missing out on those
sorts of references anytime I see an anime movie. Is there something culturally
significant about evil blob creatures? Does every Japanese child understand
that there are some people who can fly and some who cannot and that’s
just the way it is? These things and others come up so often throughout
the entire body of anime work I’ve seen that I find it difficult
to believe that there aren’t some archetypes we Americans have missed
out on.
I find it helps my understanding of these movies to view things at least
partially through the filter of atomic holocaust. No matter where the
characters live or in what fantasy world they inhabit they all seem to
have experienced some great catastrophe in their past, spoken or unspoken,
that effects their behavior. Seems as good a coping mechanism as any for
a culture to cope with tragedy. |
| ADDED ON 11/9/05 |
|
|