# A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

V FOR VENDETTA [2006]

"1984 With Dykes"
BY: JASON VERNON
OVERALL RATING ENDING RATING
On that day in 1605, Guy Fawkes was discovered in a tunnel beneath Parliament with 36 barrels of gunpowder. He and his co-conspirators had engineered the treasonous "Gunpowder Plot" in response to the tyranny of their government under James I. Fawkes and his fellow saboteurs were hanged, drawn and quartered, and their plan to take down their government never came to pass.

In the spirit of that rebellion, in remembrance of that day, V vows to carry out the plot that Fawkes was executed for attempting on November 5th in 1605: he will blow up Parliament.

As Evey uncovers the truth about V’s mysterious past, she also discovers the truth about herself – and emerges as his unlikely ally in the culmination of his plan to ignite a revolution, bringing freedom and justice back to a society fraught with cruelty and corruption.

Someone somewhere I’m sure is saying something about how much this movie didn’t live up to its graphic novel counterpart.  I’ve never read the graphic novel, so I can’t comment except to say to that person, “Hey.  Shut up.  Go read the graphic novel then.”

I went into this film not really knowing what to expect.  I wasn’t even sure it was based on a comic book until I saw the “DC Comics” graphic in the open.  When I saw that I knew I was in for something I would probably enjoy.  Comic books seem to be the last bastion for a certain style of storytelling that I enjoy immensely.  The style mostly revolves around an ambiguity in the main character’s morality.  We are enticed to be on their “side” simply because they are the focus of attention (and in this case the worse of two evils is presented clearly), but their motives and actions are questionable.  Sure it’s fun to watch Indian Jones find gold things and kill Nazis or to watch the good tornado chasers thwart the evil tornado chasers, but it’s also fun to question the ideals of the character the film maker is dropping in your lap saying “Here’s the good guy.”

There are a few “suspension of disbelief” issues.  It’s a movie based on a comic book, so I’m already ready to accept a lot of hooey as truth.  Two things really rubbed me the wrong way though. Near the beginning V uses some sort of concrete sealing gun to seal a door.  When it happened I was like “woah that was cool,” but the gun never reappears and there is little other technology of the kind laying around in this not-so-far-in-the-future future.  The other that struck me as odd is the big brother-esk government can’t find Natalie Portman when she leaves V and just starts walking around.  I’m sure they didn’t stop looking for her.  They found her easily enough the first time.  They even try to explain it with a story about her at the supermarket and that somehow when V changed her outlook on life it changed her enough that no one would recognize her.  Cheesy.

The plot of the movie resembles what most liberals would consider to be a wet dream.  One guy is wronged by the government, he gets mad, and somehow gets the entire country to unite in toppling that government.  Basically imagine a 1984 government with a George Bush-esk hyper-conservative religious right-winger gone awry mixed with a genetically enhanced masked idealist.  What you get is a heavy-handed political story with style and violence.  Add a misplaced dash of romance, british accents, numerous references to Bonfire Night and there you have it.  Oh and the dykes.

 

ADDED ON 3/18/06